Images Versus Photographs
As a wildlife photographer, the choice between referring to work as images versus photographs reflects more than just a linguistic preference; it embodies a deeper understanding of my craft, its nuances, and the evolving nature of photography as an art form and a medium of communication.
First, let's delve into the term photograph. Traditionally, a photograph is understood as a representation of reality captured through the lens of a camera. It suggests a moment frozen in time; a snapshot of the physical world as seen by the photographer. This term carries a sense of documentary realism, implying that what is depicted is an objective portrayal of the subject.
However, wildlife photography often transcends mere documentation. It involves capturing moments that are not only visually striking but also emotionally resonant. These images convey narratives, evoke feelings, and provoke thoughts about the natural world and our relationship with it. Therefore, referring to my work as images acknowledges this broader spectrum of meaning and intentionality.
Images encompasses more than just the visual content of a photograph. It implies a creative process wherein the photographer makes deliberate choices about composition, lighting, perspective, and timing to convey a specific message or evoke a particular response. Wildlife photography, in particular, requires patience, skill, and a deep understanding of animal behavior and habitats to capture compelling images that go beyond mere snapshots.
The word images suggests a level of artistry and creativity that goes into the production of each photograph. It recognizes that photography is not merely about capturing what is in front of the camera but also about interpreting and presenting it in a way that engages and inspires viewers. As a wildlife photographer, I strive to create images that not only showcase the beauty and diversity of wildlife but also tell stories and raise awareness about conservation and environmental issues.
Further, the term images acknowledge the role of technology and digital manipulation in modern photography. While purists may argue that a photograph should be untouched and unaltered, the reality is that digital tools allow photographers to enhance, edit, and refine their images to achieve the desired aesthetic and emotional impact. Referring to my work as images acknowledges this creative process and the use of technology as tools for artistic expression.
The choice between images and photographs also reflects changes in how we consume visual media in the digital age. With the proliferation of social media platforms and online galleries, photographs are often viewed on screens rather than in print. The term images is more inclusive of this digital landscape and the diverse ways in which photography is shared and experienced today.
Ultimately, whether I refer to my work as images or photographs is a matter of personal preference and context. However, as a wildlife photographer, I find that images better captures the essence of what I strive to achieve through my photography – not just capturing moments in nature, but creating visual stories that resonate with viewers and contribute to a deeper appreciation and understanding of the natural world.
Choice of terminology reflects the evolving nature of photography as an art form and a means of communication. By referring to my work as images, I embrace the creative process, intentionality, and broader implications of my photography, highlighting its role in storytelling, conservation, and shaping our perception of wildlife and the environment.
